1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 1978 Volvo 264 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 264. (149 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 264. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Disco Volante | 264 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2650 mm |