1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1984 Volvo 360
To start off, 1984 Volvo 360 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 360. (115 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Volvo 360 weights approximately 381 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1984 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Disco Volante | 360 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2410 mm |