1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1985 Mazda 626
To start off, 1985 Mazda 626 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 626. (102 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mazda 626 weights approximately 301 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1985 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Disco Volante | 626 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1036 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2520 mm |