1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (158 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Disco Volante | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2835 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2580 mm |
