1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1990 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1990 Lincoln Continental is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 905 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1990 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lincoln |
| Model | Disco Volante | Continental |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2780 mm |
