1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1995 BMW CLS
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1995 BMW CLS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | Disco Volante | CLS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2710 mm |
