1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1996 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Caprice is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 4,312 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Caprice (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1996 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Disco Volante | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4312 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 5440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2950 mm |
