1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 427 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. (156 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1567 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Disco Volante | E |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 7255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 583 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 2302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2600 mm |