1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 2,437 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 770 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Disco Volante | Condor |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2640 mm |