1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 2005 Chevrolet Spark
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Spark weights approximately 41 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Spark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 2005 Chevrolet Spark | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Disco Volante | Spark |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 796 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 776 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2350 mm |
