1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 2006 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 2006 Cadillac DTS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Disco Volante | DTS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2940 mm |
