1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 2009 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2009 Ford Kuga is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. Both 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante and 2009 Ford Kuga are equipped with a 1,997 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Ford Kuga. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Kuga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Kuga weights approximately 805 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 2009 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 2009 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Disco Volante | Kuga |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2700 mm |