1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159 vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159 (421 HP @ 9300 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo GP 159 | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | GP 159 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 421 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1788 kg |
