1952 Allard J2 vs. 1971 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1971 ZAZ 966 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2 (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard J2 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1971 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 1971 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Allard | ZAZ |
| Model | J2 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 885 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2170 mm |
