1952 Allard J2 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (268 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1162 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Allard | Volvo |
| Model | J2 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 72 L |
