1952 Allard J2 vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 565 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Allard | Jaguar |
| Model | J2 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 85 L |
