1952 Allard J2 vs. 2003 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2003 Mercury Sable is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2 (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mercury Sable. (153 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercury Sable weights approximately 532 kg more than 1952 Allard J2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2003 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Allard | Mercury |
| Model | J2 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1512 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 85 L |
