1952 Allard J2 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 705 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Allard | Dodge |
| Model | J2 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 83 L |
