1952 Allard J2 vs. 2009 Maybach 62
To start off, 2009 Maybach 62 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Maybach 62 (605 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 446 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1755 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2009 Maybach 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Maybach |
| Model | J2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 605 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 6170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 110 L |
