1952 Allard J2 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 383 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1363 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4506 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
