1952 Allard J2 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 534 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1514 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4442 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 66 L |
