1952 Allard J2 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2. (159 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 788 kg more than 1952 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | J2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1768 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |
