1952 Allard J2R vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard J2R weights approximately 178 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Allard | Lotus |
| Model | J2R | Elan |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 59 L |
