1952 Allard J2R vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1969 Zastava 1500 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard J2R weights approximately 18 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Allard | Zastava |
| Model | J2R | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2430 mm |
