1952 Allard J2R vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 402 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Allard | Volvo |
Model | J2R | 265 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2660 mm |