1952 Allard J2R vs. 1984 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1984 Holden Commodore is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1984 Holden Commodore. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Holden Commodore weights approximately 382 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Commodore. (361 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 1984 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | J2R | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 5040 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2680 mm |