1952 Allard J2R vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
| Model | J2R | FTO |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1300 mm |
