1952 Allard J2R vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 112 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Allard | Proton |
Model | J2R | 400 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |