1952 Allard J2R vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 526 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | J2R | Camaro |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 468 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 257 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 57 L |