1952 Allard J2R vs. 1998 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1998 Ford Taurus is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1998 Ford Taurus. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Taurus.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Taurus. (264 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 1998 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | J2R | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 264 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
