1952 Allard J2R vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard J2R weights approximately 118 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (205 Nm). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
Make | Allard | Peugeot |
Model | J2R | Tulip |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |