1952 Allard J2R vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2R. (251 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard J2R. (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard J2R.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Allard | Lincoln |
| Model | J2R | Continental |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 410 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 571 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1510 mm |
