1952 Allard J2R vs. 2003 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet S-10 weights approximately 472 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard J2R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2003 Chevrolet S-10 | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | J2R | S-10 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3130 mm |
