1952 Allard J2R vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 387 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (222 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2R | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1311 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
