1952 Allard J2R vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Allard | Nissan |
Model | J2R | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 90 L |