1952 Allard J2R vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | J2R | Epica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |