1952 Allard J2R vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1412 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard J2R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard J2R. (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard J2R.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Allard | Jeep |
Model | J2R | Commander |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2987 cc |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 2270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2790 mm |