1952 Allard J2R vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2R | 5 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
