1952 Allard J2R vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard J2R (251 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard J2R should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | J2R | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 57 L |
