1952 Allard J2R vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (310 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2R. (251 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1412 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford F-150. (494 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | J2R | F-150 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5415 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 310 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 98 L |