1952 Allard J2R vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1952 Allard J2R. (251 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu. (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard J2R | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | J2R | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5415 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 508 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 61 L |
