1952 Allard J2R vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 387 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard J2R (508 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1952 Allard J2R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard J2R | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Allard | Mini |
Model | J2R | Countryman |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 508 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 880 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 47 L |