1952 Allard K2 vs. 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt
To start off, 1952 Allard K2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt (141 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | K2 | Thunderbolt |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
