1952 Allard K2 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1952 Allard K2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 552 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | K2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3210 mm |
