1952 Allard K2 vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1952 Allard K2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
| Make | Allard | Singer |
| Model | K2 | SM 1500 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2320 mm |
