1952 Allard K2 vs. 1954 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1954 Hudson Metropolitan. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1954 Hudson Metropolitan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1954 Hudson Metropolitan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1954 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Allard | Hudson |
Model | K2 | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2170 mm |