1952 Allard K2 vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 1954 Rover P4 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1954 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1954 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Rover P4 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1952 Allard K2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1954 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Allard | Rover |
| Model | K2 | P4 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2103 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
