1952 Allard K2 vs. 1956 Buick 40
To start off, 1956 Buick 40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (217 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 504 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1956 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Allard | Buick |
| Model | K2 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1704 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3110 mm |
