1952 Allard K2 vs. 1959 Austin A 35
To start off, 1959 Austin A 35 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1959 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1959 Austin A 35 | |
| Make | Allard | Austin |
| Model | K2 | A 35 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2030 mm |
