1952 Allard K2 vs. 1959 Austin-Healey 3000
To start off, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 (124 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 57 kg more than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | |
| Make | Allard | Austin-Healey |
| Model | K2 | 3000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2911 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1143 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2340 mm |
